Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, AJA University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Improvement following treatment does not, in itself, establish what has recovered. Pain relief, new matrix formation, and the restoration of tissue function represent distinct outcomes. In regenerative medicine, these distinctions inform the design of subsequent experiments, the interpretation of clinical trials, and patients’ expectations. Yet the term “regenerative” can obscure these differences when a therapeutic ambition is presented as an observed outcome.
Shahrezaee, M. (2027). What Counts as Regeneration? Aligning Claims With Evidence in Regenerative Medicine. (e254383). Journal of Translational Regenerative Medicine, 2(1), e254383
MLA
Shahrezaee, M. "What Counts as Regeneration? Aligning Claims With Evidence in Regenerative Medicine" .e254383 , Journal of Translational Regenerative Medicine, 2, 1, 2027, e254383.
HARVARD
Shahrezaee, M. (2027). 'What Counts as Regeneration? Aligning Claims With Evidence in Regenerative Medicine', Journal of Translational Regenerative Medicine, 2(1), e254383.
CHICAGO
Shahrezaee, M., "What Counts as Regeneration? Aligning Claims With Evidence in Regenerative Medicine." Journal of Translational Regenerative Medicine, 2 1 (2027): e254383,
VANCOUVER
Shahrezaee M. What Counts as Regeneration? Aligning Claims With Evidence in Regenerative Medicine. J Transl Regen Med. 2027;2(1):e254383.
